Tag Archives: 3D

Laser Light Engines Addresses Maturing Market

Replacing the Xenon bulb with laser light via fibre to the projector head has made a few more advances and stumbles in the last 6 months. The requirement of screen shakers to avoid speckle took a dramatic hit this week (is moving standing waves an oxymoron? what if they are multi-colored?), even though high brightness 3D was seen by many and lauded at the same time.

As the industry matures to this obvious point, Bill Beck from Laser Light Engines has continued his educate motif and this week gave a presentation that changed from merely explaining important issues like why picking the correct laser primaries will affect efficiency (read: costs) to “Let’s ask the Right Questions”. Since this is CinemaCon week and there is no time to iterate on the nuance in these slides, we’ll just post them as a PDF, then write another more detailed article next week.

Laser Light Engines Addresses Maturing Market

Replacing the Xenon bulb with laser light via fibre to the projector head has made a few more advances and stumbles in the last 6 months. The requirement of screen shakers to avoid speckle took a dramatic hit this week (is moving standing waves an oxymoron? what if they are multi-colored?), even though high brightness 3D was seen by many and lauded at the same time.

As the industry matures to this obvious point, Bill Beck from Laser Light Engines has continued his educate motif and this week gave a presentation that changed from merely explaining important issues like why picking the correct laser primaries will affect efficiency (read: costs) to “Let’s ask the Right Questions”. Since this is CinemaCon week and there is no time to iterate on the nuance in these slides, we’ll just post them as a PDF, then write another more detailed article next week.

Post-Installation Cinema Test Tools; USL LSS-100 and DTT Digital eXperience Guardian

The unit plugs into the cinema facility’s IP network so these readings can be taken by anyone with access through the firewall.

The unit is small and unobtrusive, with only the power and ethernet cables going through the wall, connecting the system into the booth and then to the IP network.

This is how the setup page looks, and following that is a shot of the unit itself and a version of the report it creates.

USL LSS-100 Setup Sheet


 

USL LSS-100 Network A/V Monitoring Device


 

USL LSS-100 Report Page


Another network device is the DXG – Digital eXperiance Guardian from Digital Test Tools, LLC. This new company is filled with industry veterans and this is their first product in this collaboration.

The DXG setup is more complex since both its microphone section and its colorimeter remote suspend from the ceiling. In one sense it is easier, since it uses Power Over Ethernet, which puts power, control and data on one ethernet cable.

The design uses 5 microphones to discern levels at many frequencies, as well as phase and the direction of THD problems. Pulsed sounds at various frequencies avoids the buildup problems that pink noise creates. With all this, if a new rattle or hum occurs, a technician can be sent by the NOC to look for something in a particular direction that reacts to a particular frequency, decreasing the time to find whatever got loose or was inserted into or taken from the audio system.

Like the USL system, the DXG’s value comes from giving the user “changes from a baseline” measurements. Both systems would be used after a picture and audio room tuning to establish that baseline. Since the DXG captures much more data (levels and THD at different frequecies from individual speakers, and phase information from pairs of speakers at multiple frequencies, for example) the output is put into an xml file and an SQL database so that reports can be generated. These standard tools allow the client to easily integrate the data and reports into their monitoring systems.

There is also a parameters list which the customer sets up to monitor “warning” and “critical” points that can trigger notification through Web 2.0 interfaces. And, critically, the system uses ‘percentage of variation from the baseline’ since it is easier to keep track of trends this way instead of using baseline numbers that might vary from room to room. Knowing that the data point has gone beyond a 5% threshold, for example, is easier to notice than figuring whether the new x,y matrix numbers are within MacAdam’s Just Noticable Difference oval.

In addition to the “variation from the baseline” concept the DXG colorimeter also includes a pull-down in the auditorium set-up page to mark date and serial number changes of bulbs, both for 2D==>3D changes and for EOL changes. Plus, instead of one 2 degree spot – the SMPTE/ISO spec for calibration – the DXG colorimeter measures a broad section of the screen.

The system includes audio and picture DCPs that run through the projection system. The test system and projection system run asynchronously, meaning that there is no connection or feedback to or from the system under test. A playlist is created with automation instructions to shut down the lights, put the masking in the proper position, put the sound processor at the proper level, make a warning annoucement in the room, then play the DCPs in the proper sequence. Since audio contamination from adjoining rooms would throw off the audio tests, care must be taken when setting up the daily or weekly process.

The DigitalTestTools literature states that there is plenty of space for growth with the DXG, with options for forensic marking tests and IP network tests coming in the near future, as well as an option to test the signals from the various equipment that broadcasts data and sound to personal closed caption and enhanced listening systems for the deaf, blind, hard of hearing and partially sighted patrons.

Following are some screen shots from the Digital eXperiance Guardian. There is a features movie at Digital eXperiance Guardian Movie.

Now that over 80% of North American screens have made the digital conversion with the EU and UK not far behind, it is great to see that the industry has matured to deal with this last lingering problem of screens drifting out of spec. Consumers complain about it, exhibitors have paid enormous sums to get equipment that can be impeccably tuned. Now there are two methods to montor the actual room.

Finally, it should be pointed out and noticed that your author/editor, Charles ‘C J’ Flynn of dcinematools.com is also Charles ‘C J’ Flynn, a founding partner of digitaltesttools.com – he is also a long term admirer of USL and the excellent equipment that they produce. So while this article is somewhat an infomercial, it is written as a scientist and disseminator of valuable information…and presuming that it is just a launching point for further research. C J Flynn has also been a long time advocate of Post-Installation Cinema Compliance, writing and presenting at IBC on the topic as far back as 2006 (after retiring from the labors of setting up cinema servers and training their users since before Star Wars II.


Digital eXperience Guardian – the DXG Multiroom Network Setup


 

Digital eXperience Guardian – The DXG Rear Panel showing Power Over Ethernet Interface


DXG Report – One Speaker – With Errors

Post-Installation Cinema Test Tools; USL LSS-100 and DTT Digital eXperience Guardian

The unit plugs into the cinema facility’s IP network so these readings can be taken by anyone with access through the firewall.

The unit is small and unobtrusive, with only the power and ethernet cables going through the wall, connecting the system into the booth and then to the IP network.

This is how the setup page looks, and following that is a shot of the unit itself and a version of the report it creates.

USL LSS-100 Setup Sheet


 

USL LSS-100 Network A/V Monitoring Device


 

USL LSS-100 Report Page


Another network device is the DXG – Digital eXperiance Guardian from Digital Test Tools, LLC. This new company is filled with industry veterans and this is their first product in this collaboration.

The DXG setup is more complex since both its microphone section and its colorimeter remote suspend from the ceiling. In one sense it is easier, since it uses Power Over Ethernet, which puts power, control and data on one ethernet cable.

The design uses 5 microphones to discern levels at many frequencies, as well as phase and the direction of THD problems. Pulsed sounds at various frequencies avoids the buildup problems that pink noise creates. With all this, if a new rattle or hum occurs, a technician can be sent by the NOC to look for something in a particular direction that reacts to a particular frequency, decreasing the time to find whatever got loose or was inserted into or taken from the audio system.

Like the USL system, the DXG’s value comes from giving the user “changes from a baseline” measurements. Both systems would be used after a picture and audio room tuning to establish that baseline. Since the DXG captures much more data (levels and THD at different frequecies from individual speakers, and phase information from pairs of speakers at multiple frequencies, for example) the output is put into an xml file and an SQL database so that reports can be generated. These standard tools allow the client to easily integrate the data and reports into their monitoring systems.

There is also a parameters list which the customer sets up to monitor “warning” and “critical” points that can trigger notification through Web 2.0 interfaces. And, critically, the system uses ‘percentage of variation from the baseline’ since it is easier to keep track of trends this way instead of using baseline numbers that might vary from room to room. Knowing that the data point has gone beyond a 5% threshold, for example, is easier to notice than figuring whether the new x,y matrix numbers are within MacAdam’s Just Noticable Difference oval.

In addition to the “variation from the baseline” concept the DXG colorimeter also includes a pull-down in the auditorium set-up page to mark date and serial number changes of bulbs, both for 2D==>3D changes and for EOL changes. Plus, instead of one 2 degree spot – the SMPTE/ISO spec for calibration – the DXG colorimeter measures a broad section of the screen.

The system includes audio and picture DCPs that run through the projection system. The test system and projection system run asynchronously, meaning that there is no connection or feedback to or from the system under test. A playlist is created with automation instructions to shut down the lights, put the masking in the proper position, put the sound processor at the proper level, make a warning annoucement in the room, then play the DCPs in the proper sequence. Since audio contamination from adjoining rooms would throw off the audio tests, care must be taken when setting up the daily or weekly process.

The DigitalTestTools literature states that there is plenty of space for growth with the DXG, with options for forensic marking tests and IP network tests coming in the near future, as well as an option to test the signals from the various equipment that broadcasts data and sound to personal closed caption and enhanced listening systems for the deaf, blind, hard of hearing and partially sighted patrons.

Following are some screen shots from the Digital eXperiance Guardian. There is a features movie at Digital eXperiance Guardian Movie.

Now that over 80% of North American screens have made the digital conversion with the EU and UK not far behind, it is great to see that the industry has matured to deal with this last lingering problem of screens drifting out of spec. Consumers complain about it, exhibitors have paid enormous sums to get equipment that can be impeccably tuned. Now there are two methods to montor the actual room.

Finally, it should be pointed out and noticed that your author/editor, Charles ‘C J’ Flynn of dcinematools.com is also Charles ‘C J’ Flynn, a founding partner of digitaltesttools.com – he is also a long term admirer of USL and the excellent equipment that they produce. So while this article is somewhat an infomercial, it is written as a scientist and disseminator of valuable information…and presuming that it is just a launching point for further research. C J Flynn has also been a long time advocate of Post-Installation Cinema Compliance, writing and presenting at IBC on the topic as far back as 2006 (after retiring from the labors of setting up cinema servers and training their users since before Star Wars II.


Digital eXperience Guardian – the DXG Multiroom Network Setup


 

Digital eXperience Guardian – The DXG Rear Panel showing Power Over Ethernet Interface


DXG Report – One Speaker – With Errors

Gone and Back Again–Return of The Hobbitses

 

Film is dead and badly done CGI is dead and it is about time that badly done 3D be dead too. In the future, that will mean 24fps shown as 96fps (triple flashing the same picture) is dead and it won’t mean replacing it with 48fps double-flashing. 

As we learned at the 2012 SMPTE/NAB DCinema Days event (or whatever they are called now), there are problems with 48fps that are alleviated at somewhere above 52fps. Jackson’s representative (Phil Oatley, the post group head of technology from Park Road Post) said that 48 was chosen because they didn’t know if 60fps was achievable in the exhibition field, so they stuck with what seemed do-able: 2X the frames and the data rate. 

Even at that, Warner Bros. wasn’t sure enough of the field changes to trust that audio tracks for the blind or visually impaired wouldn’t negatively affect the movie, so were left out of the HFR mix. (Captions with 3D are still a different Pandora’s Box.)

But 48fps was shown to the SMPTE/NAB attendees to be the wrong choice by Dr. Marty Banks (of the Visual Space Perception Laboratory at the University of California – my tax dollars at work~!) Presumably Jackson is in too deep to change from 48. But there is no news that anyone else is going to follow. The next announced HFR (besides Hobbit II) will be Avatar II’s 60fps, and the script isn’t written for that. 

So film is unwatchable and thankfully dead. HFR as announced will be a rare jewel – though wouldn’t it be nice if Disney/Pixar/Lucas were to surprise us. Katzenberg announced at CinemaCon 2011 that we should expect new chips from them that will dramatically change computation time in production and post…maybe that will bring more/better as well.

That leaves exhibition. It was relatively painless to get to 48fps. 60fps is a different story. Will a doubling of the datarate to 500mb/s suffice? Testing remains, but at least there is time to do it. Perhaps now there will be some backing for the www.image.matters.pro road show. Image Matters Powers High Frame Rate Digital Cinema Quality

Gone and Back Again–Return of The Hobbitses

 

Film is dead and badly done CGI is dead and it is about time that badly done 3D be dead too. In the future, that will mean 24fps shown as 96fps (triple flashing the same picture) is dead and it won’t mean replacing it with 48fps double-flashing. 

As we learned at the 2012 SMPTE/NAB DCinema Days event (or whatever they are called now), there are problems with 48fps that are alleviated at somewhere above 52fps. Jackson’s representative (Phil Oatley, the post group head of technology from Park Road Post) said that 48 was chosen because they didn’t know if 60fps was achievable in the exhibition field, so they stuck with what seemed do-able: 2X the frames and the data rate. 

Even at that, Warner Bros. wasn’t sure enough of the field changes to trust that audio tracks for the blind or visually impaired wouldn’t negatively affect the movie, so were left out of the HFR mix. (Captions with 3D are still a different Pandora’s Box.)

But 48fps was shown to the SMPTE/NAB attendees to be the wrong choice by Dr. Marty Banks (of the Visual Space Perception Laboratory at the University of California – my tax dollars at work~!) Presumably Jackson is in too deep to change from 48. But there is no news that anyone else is going to follow. The next announced HFR (besides Hobbit II) will be Avatar II’s 60fps, and the script isn’t written for that. 

So film is unwatchable and thankfully dead. HFR as announced will be a rare jewel – though wouldn’t it be nice if Disney/Pixar/Lucas were to surprise us. Katzenberg announced at CinemaCon 2011 that we should expect new chips from them that will dramatically change computation time in production and post…maybe that will bring more/better as well.

That leaves exhibition. It was relatively painless to get to 48fps. 60fps is a different story. Will a doubling of the datarate to 500mb/s suffice? Testing remains, but at least there is time to do it. Perhaps now there will be some backing for the www.image.matters.pro road show. Image Matters Powers High Frame Rate Digital Cinema Quality

Excellent 3D Presentations of Ray Zone – RIP

Conference and Exhibition

The World’s Premier Conference for 3D Innovation

 
 

vale Ray Zone

The chairs and committee of the Stereoscopic Displays and Applications conference wish to recognize the contributions of 3D author and historian Ray Zone, who passed away last week.

We have read the many heartfelt and warm reports of Ray’s impact on and contributions to our stereoscopic 3D community.  It is clear that Ray was an inspiration to many in the 3D community.  He was warm and generous and always happy to share his vast knowledge with newcomers as well as with fellow experts.  He will be acutely missed and remembered in the years to come.

As a tribute to Ray’s accomplishments in the world of stereoscopic 3D, the SD&A conference, SPIE and IS&T, have made available three items to help us remember Ray:

–          A short candid 3D video of Ray at the _1992_ SD&A conference filmed by David Starkman.  The video is available on YouTube3D here:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgFCryWZtXM

–          Then we can fast-forward 20 years to the _2012_ SD&A conference this past January to witness Ray’s conference presentation “Thinking in Z-Space: Flatness and Spatial Narrativity”
http://river-valley.tv/thinking-in-z-space-flatness-and-spatial-narrativity/
At the beginning of the video you can hear Ray saying “I’ve been coming to this conference now for 20 years on and off and it’s a joy to be here” – it’s not often that there is video evidence of that 20 year involvement!

–          Finally, SPIE Press has kindly provided open access to Ray’s two published papers that were presented at the SD&A conference in 1996 and 2012.
The papers are: 
Ray Zone (2012) “Thinking in Z-Space: Flatness and Spatial Narrativity”
http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1282677
and
Ray Zone (1996) “Deep image: 3D in art and science” (Keynote Presentation)
http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1013971
These papers will remain open access until the end of February.

You may also wish to visit his Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Zone

We hope you will appreciate this opportunity to see, hear and read of Ray’s impact on the 3D community.

RIP Ray.

Andrew Woods

Co-Chair Stereoscopic Displays and Applications

www.stereoscopic.org

 

 

Excellent 3D Presentations of Ray Zone – RIP

Conference and Exhibition

The World’s Premier Conference for 3D Innovation

 
 

vale Ray Zone

The chairs and committee of the Stereoscopic Displays and Applications conference wish to recognize the contributions of 3D author and historian Ray Zone, who passed away last week.

We have read the many heartfelt and warm reports of Ray’s impact on and contributions to our stereoscopic 3D community.  It is clear that Ray was an inspiration to many in the 3D community.  He was warm and generous and always happy to share his vast knowledge with newcomers as well as with fellow experts.  He will be acutely missed and remembered in the years to come.

As a tribute to Ray’s accomplishments in the world of stereoscopic 3D, the SD&A conference, SPIE and IS&T, have made available three items to help us remember Ray:

–          A short candid 3D video of Ray at the _1992_ SD&A conference filmed by David Starkman.  The video is available on YouTube3D here:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgFCryWZtXM

–          Then we can fast-forward 20 years to the _2012_ SD&A conference this past January to witness Ray’s conference presentation “Thinking in Z-Space: Flatness and Spatial Narrativity”
http://river-valley.tv/thinking-in-z-space-flatness-and-spatial-narrativity/
At the beginning of the video you can hear Ray saying “I’ve been coming to this conference now for 20 years on and off and it’s a joy to be here” – it’s not often that there is video evidence of that 20 year involvement!

–          Finally, SPIE Press has kindly provided open access to Ray’s two published papers that were presented at the SD&A conference in 1996 and 2012.
The papers are: 
Ray Zone (2012) “Thinking in Z-Space: Flatness and Spatial Narrativity”
http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1282677
and
Ray Zone (1996) “Deep image: 3D in art and science” (Keynote Presentation)
http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1013971
These papers will remain open access until the end of February.

You may also wish to visit his Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Zone

We hope you will appreciate this opportunity to see, hear and read of Ray’s impact on the 3D community.

RIP Ray.

Andrew Woods

Co-Chair Stereoscopic Displays and Applications

www.stereoscopic.org

 

 

IBC 2012 Tools and Tips

The 2nd issue that I noticed is that it doesn’t seem to be trustworthy yet. Besides being slow, it has wrong data. The first event that I checked – the EDCF D-Cinema Update Conference Event – shows correctly on 11 September, but doesn’t show the correct time. It shows 11AM instead of the 10AM time that the IBC site shows. It also doesn’t say where, which the online listing shows. [Room E102]

I very directly asked John Graham, General Secratary of the EDCF, about the rumor that I started which speculates that the Sunday 11AM conference on Future Projection Technologies will be all about Higgs Boson technologies and their application to Digital Cinema.

He says that he can’t announce anything in advance of the conferences.

Both the D-Cinema Update and the Future Projection Tech are free, and both are worth a fortune.

The Conference link is:

IBC2012 – Target specific areas of interest and build your own programme.


Flying into Schiphol Airport is usually pretty easy. Walking out of the customs area there are a couple rings of shops. In the past there has been an IBC welcome table where one can get their travel passes…but the travel pass is not good for the train to the RAI. The penalty for not having a ticket on the train is 35€.

There is also a bus to the RAI. I haven’t taken it and don’t know where the platform is. But the nice thing about the train is that for 3 euros it takes 10 minutes every time. Traffic can make a car or buss ride take 30 minutes.

One can go to the yellow kiosks to buy the train ticket…it isn’t obvious though…why not just select “R” and navigate to: RAI Station? Because the machine thinks of it as Amsterdam RAI…selected under the “A”.

Can you get a ticket with an out of country credit card. Sometimes, though sometimes I have seen people with English cards fail, and I have had problems with my French cards. Carry a few euros is the safe bet. And, definitely, American credit cards won’t work.


This will be an ongoing article with updates…there is still the announcements about the movies to come and most of the cool conference info is obscure…thanks be to the holy pizza that it doesn’t seem to be 3D HFR all the time.

IBC 2012 Tools and Tips

The 2nd issue that I noticed is that it doesn’t seem to be trustworthy yet. Besides being slow, it has wrong data. The first event that I checked – the EDCF D-Cinema Update Conference Event – shows correctly on 11 September, but doesn’t show the correct time. It shows 11AM instead of the 10AM time that the IBC site shows. It also doesn’t say where, which the online listing shows. [Room E102]

I very directly asked John Graham, General Secratary of the EDCF, about the rumor that I started which speculates that the Sunday 11AM conference on Future Projection Technologies will be all about Higgs Boson technologies and their application to Digital Cinema.

He says that he can’t announce anything in advance of the conferences.

Both the D-Cinema Update and the Future Projection Tech are free, and both are worth a fortune.

The Conference link is:

IBC2012 – Target specific areas of interest and build your own programme.


Flying into Schiphol Airport is usually pretty easy. Walking out of the customs area there are a couple rings of shops. In the past there has been an IBC welcome table where one can get their travel passes…but the travel pass is not good for the train to the RAI. The penalty for not having a ticket on the train is 35€.

There is also a bus to the RAI. I haven’t taken it and don’t know where the platform is. But the nice thing about the train is that for 3 euros it takes 10 minutes every time. Traffic can make a car or buss ride take 30 minutes.

One can go to the yellow kiosks to buy the train ticket…it isn’t obvious though…why not just select “R” and navigate to: RAI Station? Because the machine thinks of it as Amsterdam RAI…selected under the “A”.

Can you get a ticket with an out of country credit card. Sometimes, though sometimes I have seen people with English cards fail, and I have had problems with my French cards. Carry a few euros is the safe bet. And, definitely, American credit cards won’t work.


This will be an ongoing article with updates…there is still the announcements about the movies to come and most of the cool conference info is obscure…thanks be to the holy pizza that it doesn’t seem to be 3D HFR all the time.

File Festival Deliverables

Only a few years ago there were no festivals which offered to take DCPs (Digital Cinema Packages) as a regular item, then the big ones made the effort by making the DCPs from digital masters. Two years ago it was confusing and still uncommon for a DCP to be accepted, but rules were being set out and tested. This year it would be uncommon for a festival not to have a procedure for accepting a DCP.

But it is still a complicated process, for a lot of obvious and a lot of obscure reasons. The first question always seems to be, “Can’t I just deliver a QuickTime file? DCPs are soooo expensive.” The answer is: Yes you can. You can deliver something on tape as well, or an 8 bit DVD or 10 bit Blu Ray. (Oops! There is no 10 bit Blu Ray!!! only 8 bit.) You can introduce yourself in a suit that has been in mothballs for 10 years as well and give away 5 day old pre-buttered popcorn with your festival submission. But you don’t want to. The difference in quality between those and a correctly made DCP will be too striking, doing an injustice to your great plot and characters.

This will be the first in a series of festival information articles, and we start with a good package of data from Cine Tech Geek in the form of YouTube videos.

One last note before CineTech Geek’s great videos: DCinemaTraining.com would like to accept any materials to make a Film Festival Course. If you have interest in contributing, please write the editor of dcinematraining


James at CineTech Geek has been working as an integrator for cinemas in Australia, and also as a manufacturer and software engineer. His various websites are:

Company Site: DigitAll: http://www.digitall.net.au

YouTube – http://www.youtube.com/cinetechgeek

Personal Tech Blog – http://www.crafted.com.au/blog/

The clips begin with an ad for the digitAll dcpPlayer Version 2. If you are interested in DCPs, you should be interested in spending a mere $250 for a program that will allow you to play several formats of dcp. Previewing your work is a topic that will be fleshed out in a future article. Using a tool like this isn’t the same as trying out the DCP on the exact models of server and projector that is used in the festival, but it is an advisable start. In one of the videos, James shows a high frame rate 3D DCP playing through a portable computer.

This digitAll software is a Windows application, so it plays natively on a Windows PC, or on a speedy Mac with a virtual partition. (Either the free Apple Bootcamp, or VirtualBox from Sun (now Oracle), or systems from VMWare or Parallels (each about $79.)

One thing that James doesn’t bring up is the interface between bluray (and other consumer format) audio, which is different than most cinema theater set-ups, in many ways. Consider buying or renting the Gefen Inc EXT AVCINEMAAD A/V Cinema Scaler. You may think, “I don’t need a scaler.” In reality, if you are screening many different types of inputs, you probably will need a scaler. But the audio transitions between different consumer and professional deliverables are the real difficulty in interfacing. (James points out that those cinemas with a Dolby 750 Audio Processor will have the required audio interchange capability already. It should also be pointed out that Christie’s new SKA-3D is the latest iteration of Gefen’s everything to everything box. But we digress.)

On with the show(s):

Film Festival Deliverables: Part 1 Media

Film Festival Deliverables: Part 2 – On the Cheap

Fim Festival Devliverables: Part 3 – Film Producer

Film Festival Deliverables: Part 4 – Festival Producer

The presentation can also be found in PDF format at:

http://www.d-cine.net/cinetechgeek/FilmFestivalDeliverables.pdf

File Festival Deliverables

Only a few years ago there were no festivals which offered to take DCPs (Digital Cinema Packages) as a regular item, then the big ones made the effort by making the DCPs from digital masters. Two years ago it was confusing and still uncommon for a DCP to be accepted, but rules were being set out and tested. This year it would be uncommon for a festival not to have a procedure for accepting a DCP.

But it is still a complicated process, for a lot of obvious and a lot of obscure reasons. The first question always seems to be, “Can’t I just deliver a QuickTime file? DCPs are soooo expensive.” The answer is: Yes you can. You can deliver something on tape as well, or an 8 bit DVD or 10 bit Blu Ray. (Oops! There is no 10 bit Blu Ray!!! only 8 bit.) You can introduce yourself in a suit that has been in mothballs for 10 years as well and give away 5 day old pre-buttered popcorn with your festival submission. But you don’t want to. The difference in quality between those and a correctly made DCP will be too striking, doing an injustice to your great plot and characters.

This will be the first in a series of festival information articles, and we start with a good package of data from Cine Tech Geek in the form of YouTube videos.

One last note before CineTech Geek’s great videos: DCinemaTraining.com would like to accept any materials to make a Film Festival Course. If you have interest in contributing, please write the editor of dcinematraining


James at CineTech Geek has been working as an integrator for cinemas in Australia, and also as a manufacturer and software engineer. His various websites are:

Company Site: DigitAll: http://www.digitall.net.au

YouTube – http://www.youtube.com/cinetechgeek

Personal Tech Blog – http://www.crafted.com.au/blog/

The clips begin with an ad for the digitAll dcpPlayer Version 2. If you are interested in DCPs, you should be interested in spending a mere $250 for a program that will allow you to play several formats of dcp. Previewing your work is a topic that will be fleshed out in a future article. Using a tool like this isn’t the same as trying out the DCP on the exact models of server and projector that is used in the festival, but it is an advisable start. In one of the videos, James shows a high frame rate 3D DCP playing through a portable computer.

This digitAll software is a Windows application, so it plays natively on a Windows PC, or on a speedy Mac with a virtual partition. (Either the free Apple Bootcamp, or VirtualBox from Sun (now Oracle), or systems from VMWare or Parallels (each about $79.)

One thing that James doesn’t bring up is the interface between bluray (and other consumer format) audio, which is different than most cinema theater set-ups, in many ways. Consider buying or renting the Gefen Inc EXT AVCINEMAAD A/V Cinema Scaler. You may think, “I don’t need a scaler.” In reality, if you are screening many different types of inputs, you probably will need a scaler. But the audio transitions between different consumer and professional deliverables are the real difficulty in interfacing. (James points out that those cinemas with a Dolby 750 Audio Processor will have the required audio interchange capability already. It should also be pointed out that Christie’s new SKA-3D is the latest iteration of Gefen’s everything to everything box. But we digress.)

On with the show(s):

Film Festival Deliverables: Part 1 Media

Film Festival Deliverables: Part 2 – On the Cheap

Fim Festival Devliverables: Part 3 – Film Producer

Film Festival Deliverables: Part 4 – Festival Producer

The presentation can also be found in PDF format at:

http://www.d-cine.net/cinetechgeek/FilmFestivalDeliverables.pdf

File Festival–Melzo, International

Melzo International File Festival LogoWhat fun. Third Year. In Melzo, which means, Arcadia, the nicest cinema in the world.

We believe that culture is of fundamental importance.
It is essential to invest in culture rather than to cut funds.

As Albert Camus wrote “Without culture and the related freedom that is derived from it, society, even if it were a perfect one, would be a jungle. This is why every authentic creation is a gift for the future”.

I don’t know that Camus made a comment about 3D.

Read the rest of the literature at:

http://www.imeff.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/dossier_ENG_2012.pdf


File Festival–Melzo, International

Melzo International File Festival LogoWhat fun. Third Year. In Melzo, which means, Arcadia, the nicest cinema in the world.

We believe that culture is of fundamental importance.
It is essential to invest in culture rather than to cut funds.

As Albert Camus wrote “Without culture and the related freedom that is derived from it, society, even if it were a perfect one, would be a jungle. This is why every authentic creation is a gift for the future”.

I don’t know that Camus made a comment about 3D.

Read the rest of the literature at:

http://www.imeff.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/dossier_ENG_2012.pdf


HFR-S3D Post SMPTE/CinemaCon Hobbit

Your analogy Michael, of going from standard definition to high definition or from VHS to DVD is a good one, but it doesn’t inform one of how it is similar. It is not that there are more pixels, it is that more pixels are able to be a discernible part of the picture…or can be if the director chooses. Another analogy would be to say that there is more depth of field, but instead of talking about the amount of available focus behind the point of focus, we get more ability to focus in front of the point of focus. Normally all that area in front is not only out of focus, but during any kind of motion in the scene or the camera, there is a smearing that contributes to destroying contrast in the picture. It is also very tiring for the eyes.

Cameron’s demonstration a year ago at CinemaCon made use of sword fighting and sweeping the camera around a fairly large room. The most vivid shot that allowed the technology to prove itself was a long, medium speed pan of several actors and actresses sitting at a long table with food and candles in front of them. There was also another set of actors whose backs were to us, so we’d see the back of their heads, with the view of the candles going in and out. At 24 frames per second (fps) the scene was typical, in-focus faces and quasi-focused candle flames with smeared blurs of the actors backs in front. At 48 frames per second, the smearing left. It wasn’t so important that the backs of these heads and shoulders were in focus, but that the smearing was gone so the discernible luminance of the scene increased – loosely, more contrast means colors and more colors means more natural feeling. The candle flames were brighter without being any more in focus.

Now I will bring 3D into the conversation and tell you that you are wrong Michael. 3D is not just a gimmick, and not just another tool. In fact, each picture that we see has dozens of clues of dimensionality without the parallax clues that stereoscopy brings. Everything from colors fading as we see them in the distance, to a fuzziness at the intersection of two objects (notice the shoulders compared to their background) to comparative sizes and not seeing a person’s legs when a table is in front of them, all tell the human visual system of eyes and brain and mind that there is a third dimension in the scene we are looking at. On the other hand, my guess is that most technical people in the business generally dislike the current implementations of Stereoscopic 3D, but for reasons that don’t have to do with the ugliness of the glasses or the upcharge or whether a well written scene could have served just as well. Most dislike it because even with the inherent horrors of the combination of high gain and silver screens (each with their own set of insurmountable problems), there isn’t enough light to do the process justice. And again, less light means more in-the-mud colors and fewer colors overall, especially whites and the light subtle colors that we normally use to discern subtle things.

I also was not a fan of S-3D until I saw the ‘dimensionalization’ of the final scene of Casablanca. I thought it was marvelous. It was on the other side of compelling. It was as if there needed to be an excuse to leave out the parallax. That doesn’t make badly shot or poorly dimensionalized S-3D OK, but it does make any S-3D ‘Not Ready for Prime Time’ when it isn’t then presented correctly – and that mostly has to do with the amount of light from the screen to the eyes. Which brings us back to High Frame Rates.

There was a two day set of SMPTE seminars dealing with digital cinema before NAB, which was the week before CinemaCon. Several thousand engineers got full geek treatment with an hour of ‘why lasers in the projector’ then seeing 6 minutes of demonstrations of Sony projectors with retrofit Laser Light Engines, Inc.’ laser systems, and 40 minutes on the various problems that high frame rates bring to the post production workflow, then 20 minutes of presentation from a technical representative from Peter Jackson’s team who explained some technical considerations of HFR.

There is a commonly held misconception that 24 frames per second was chosen because testing determined that this speed had something to do with the natural flutter rate of the eyes. In fact, 24 fps was chosen because it brought a movies sound to the point where it was not horrible. Similarly, there is some magic above 50 something fps and as we also learned (while Sperling was at Coachella missing the SMPTE event), there are potential problems to be wary of at 48 frames per second, demonstrated by Dr. Marty Banks of Cal Berkeley. So…

To answer one of your questions Michael, 48 frames was chosen at the time because they weren’t certain if equipment manufacturers would be able to get a working high frame rate system available by the time that The Hobbit was going to be released. But anyone who reads the trades most certainly knows that frame rates up to 60 have been in the specifications and doable since Series II projectors became available from Texas Instruments. Ah! but not in S-3D. As Sperling pointed out, this requires “in the projector” electronics to be fitted (or retrofitted) and a whole new way of thinking servers for the projector. An example: Sony announced to their 13,000 customers – give us $3,000 and we will retrofit your software to do S3D-HFR.

Going back though, to the demonstrations that Cameron did a year ago. In addition to 48fps S3D – which got rid of the front of focus blur – there were also identical shots taken at 60fps S3D. They were less WOW! but still importantly beneficial. Because of time constraints and the fact that we were sitting among Cameron’s other several thousand friends in the auditorium, there wasn’t a lot of time to look at these shots, but they reminded me of the arguments that George Massenburg made in a famous 3 part article entitled Lace and Filigree, written during audio’s transition to digital in the mid-80’s. There is something special as the speed improves akin to the benefits of increasing signal to noise in its various forms. Perhaps it all serves to put technology into the sphere of philosophy where it belongs. It certainly reminds us that all technology involves the art of compromise.

Last short aside, during the SMPTE event with the HFR panelists still on stage. One engineer came to the open mic and made a statement about government S3D skunkwork experiments that he had been part of which indicated that there was something that ‘popped’ at 53 fps and wondered if anyone else had run into that phenomena. The chair answered with a few speculations then expressed regret that Douglas Trumbull wasn’t there to give insights to his experiments in the field, since he not only had the longest record of making high frame rate movies but just opened a new digital high frame rate studio that has made several technical break-thoughs. And just like the Annie Hall/Marshall McLuhan moment, Doug came to the mic and added a few quips… OK; so that’s all we geeks get for high-level entertainment.

Keep up the good work. I enjoy the show and don’t begrudge any extra minutes you take to get all the interesting news of the week to us.

[Author’s salutations]

References:

 

High Frame Rates – The New Black, Getting to Speed

Combine 3, Drop 2, 120 becomes 24