Category Archives: Exhibition

Artist’s Intent Exposed~! See it here first. Where? In the cinema, the temporary home provided by exhibitors.

NCM Adds Metropolitan Theatres

<excise quotes from the lawyer-approved hive marketing spokes…uhm, people.>

Metropolitan represents the most recent assimilation of the NCM Cinema Network – the largest digital in-theater video and satellite distribution network in North America. NCM currently has exclusive, long-term cinema advertising agreements in place with its founding member exhibitors, AMC Entertainment Inc., Cinemark Holdings Inc. and Regal Entertainment Group , as well as network affiliate pacts with theater circuits such as Carolina Cinemas, Cobb Theatres, Galaxy Theatres, LLC, Georgia Theatre Company, Goodrich Quality Theaters, Hollywood Theaters, Kerasotes ShowPlace Theatres, MJR Theatres, Picture Show Theatres, Rave Cinemas, LLC, ShowBiz Cinemas, LLC, Starplex Cinemas, and Storyteller Theatres Corporation, among others.

Resistance is Futile

Twentieth Century Fox Selects Solar Power, Inc. for a 158 kW Solar System

Full article at:

Twentieth Century Fox Selects Solar Power, Inc. for a 158 kW Solar System

Monday, Apr 19, 2010—ROSEVILLE, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)

“We are very pleased to have been selected by Twentieth Century Fox to design and build a solar system to help them provide meaningful environmental benefits and begin to mitigate rising electricity costs,” said Brad Ferrell, President of Business Development for Solar Power, Inc. “Our SkyMount® system is a perfect fit for their needs.”

 

“This project is an important addition to Fox’s ongoing sustainability initiative and we are very happy to be getting it started,” said Hal Haenal, Senior Vice President of Fox Studios Operations. “This marks our first venture into on-site renewable energy and Solar Power, Inc. has helped to make the decision a very easy one for us.” The solar project is scheduled to be completed this summer.

Better than Avatar, live big-screen opera

exhibition logoIn the wake of a successful initiative by the New York Metropolitan Opera, national opera companies are increasingly relaying live performances to cinemas across Europe. Svenska Dagbladet waxes lyrical about the new technique which will boost accessibility to high culture.

On 14 January, an opera performed in Stockholms Konserthus was broadcast via live satellite to cinemas throughout Sweden. The event was marked by an exceptional request from the concert hall CEO, Stefan Forsberg, who asked celebrated singer Malena Ernman to invite the public to sing. The result was the spontaneous creation of the largest opera chorus in the history of the country. All of the seats in the Stockholms Konserthus had been sold out for weeks, but most of the audience watched the performance from a network of 30 cinemas across the country, which projected live high-definition footage with Dolby 5.1 surround sound.

In Sweden, the trend for the live broadcast of cultural events to networks of remote venues was launched last winter, when nine concerts at the New York Metropolitan Opera were relayed to 83 cinemas. The scheme was a runaway success, to the point where audiences for performances at the Metropolitan were larger in Sweden than they were inside the prestigious Manhattan opera house. For example, on 16 January 2009, a performance of Carmen at the New York Met, which has a maximum capacity of 3,800, attracted an audience of 7,000 in Sweden — and  Swedish music lovers have already purchased 53,000 tickets for this year’s Metropolitan programme.

20 euros a seat

Stockholm’s Royal Opera, which is also taking advantage of the trend for satellite broadcasts to remote cinemas, relayed performances of Falstaff and Cinderella from the People’s House venue last spring. The experience proved to be so successful, that it is now planning to retransmit four further performances to cinemas this year. “The Royal Opera House can seat around 1,000 people, but we had three times that number at venues around the country. Our mission is to encourage popular appreciation of opera, so we are planning to continue the transmissions,” explains the Royal Opera’s technical director Kurt Blomquist. Audiences in small provincial towns across Sweden will now be able to experience the thrill of live performances from capital cities around the world for the relatively affordable price of 20 euros a ticket.

Read More at:

Better than Avatar, live big-screen opera


Johan Hellekant


Also read the adjoining:

CONTROVERSY

On 14 January, the live broadcast of the New York Metropolitan’s Carmen was shown in 850 cinemas in 31 countries De Standaard. The Flemish daily explains that the initiative is designed to “reinforce the Met’s brand image” and “its reputation as a magnet for international opera stars.” Notwithstanding the relatively high cost of retransmissions — approximately 710,000 euros per event, which is usually offset by sponsorship deals — many of the world’s major opera hosues, including La Scala in Milan and London’s Covent Garden, are planning to follow in the footsteps of the Met.

Avatar in Arcadia – 3D can’t get larger

 

Pierro, how do you get so much light to the screen? Do the pictures completely overlap, or are they two halves put together?

Do you put sub-titles only on one projector?

Do your clients talk to you about 3D in the home? Do they appreciate being with 500 other people to watch a film like this? Or do they expect to see it in their home theater? Do you sell Blu-ray and DVD’s in your store?

Are you showing 3D in any of your other rooms? Are they also XpanD?

You have several years of experience with expensive 3D glasses (instead of throw-aways, such as RealD.) What is your experience with theft or destruction.  

Have you estimated the cost of washing the glasses? the long term cost of glasses?

There are more 3D movies coming. Do you see the situation when several 3D movies will be playing at the same time? Can Arcadia handle this?

Kodak Re-Focus/Hardware Is Out: Celluloid Junkie

  • provide services and support for existing systems
    prepare and distribute preshow content and playslists
    continue Kodak’s network operations center services
    develop and license digital cinema technologies to be commercialized by others

There is an attempt to hone in on what that licensing concept means, plus some thoughts of what this event of another large player leaving the field, mentioning Technicolor and forgetting DTS – read the entire report at:
Kodak Digital Cinema Undergoes Major Strategy Shift,
J. Sperling Reich
at Celluloid Junkie

 

Movie Theatre Popcorn Makes You Fat (Surprise!); Army Confirms

As if theatre owners didn’t have enough to worry about with studios shrinking release windows at every opportunity, they may soon have to start worrying about moviegoers bypassing the real bread and butter of any exhibitor’s business, or more appropriately the popcorn and butter. A new study conducted by the non-profit Center for Science in the Public Interest and released earlier today reports that the food items found at most movie theatre concession stands are incredibly unhealthy. Lab tests revealed that eating a medium popcorn and soda combo from Regal Cinemas was the equivalent of eating three McDonald’s Quarter Pounders topped with 12 pats of butter. For those with a more of an interest in nutrition, that’s 1610 calories and 60 grams (three days’ worth) of saturated fat. 

The CSPI report also found that the candy sold by most exhibitors is no better. An extra large box of Junior Mints contains 570 calories and 8 grams of fat. Raisinets are 420 calories and 11 grams of fat. M&Ms may be tiny but they pack in 790 calories and more than a half a day’s supply of saturated fat (16 grams). Then there’s the calorie king of all movie theatre confections, Reese’s Pieces which are loaded with 1,160 calories and 35 grams of saturated fat. To hammer the point home the study compares the intake of such candy to eating a 16-once T-bone stake with a buttered baked potato as a side order. It’s a miracle that E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial’s heart was still able to glow after downing all those Reese’s Pieces in Steven Spielberg’s blockbuster back in the early 1980s. The alien rightfully should’ve keeled over from a heart attack according to CSPI.

Read the whole thing…he tastefully covers the whole of the articles and the report.

Of course, no one should connect the dots and try to tie the Army Times report from 2 weeks ago (4 November) that said:

U.S. military-age youth are increasingly unfit to serve — mostly because they’re in such lousy shape.

According to the latest Pentagon figures, a full 35 percent, or more than one-third, of the roughly 31.2 million Americans aged 17 to 24 are unqualified for military service because of physical and medical issues. And, said Curt Gilroy, the Pentagon’s director of accessions, “the major component of this is obesity. We have an obesity crisis in the country. There’s no question about it.”

The Pentagon draws its data from the Centers for Disease Control, which regularly tracks obesity. The steadily rising trend is not good news for military recruiters, despite their recent successes, nor for the overall health of the U.S. population.

Celluloid Junkie: Report: Movie Theatre Popcorn Makes You Fat (Surprise!)

Setting The ShowEast Record Straight | Celluloid Junkie

Another factor Sunshine might not be considering is that digital cinema is maturing, growing out of its infancy and into adolescence. The technology is responsible for one of the greatest, if not most disruptive, transitions the motion picture exhibition industry has ever seen. By now, there has been some shakeout in the number of companies who entered the digital cinema space, and those that remain are naturally looking to augment their marketing plans. This is a common trend in emerging markets and industries, though unfortunately this phenomena is taking place in digital cinema during a record setting recession.

[Editor again: One hesitates to argue with Sperling, who was there, but…This moment in the transition is more important to more people than at any other confab…except the next one. The last 7 years has been important for the early adoptors, but now there is even more change that will be vital…and the decisions will be made for hundreds and in some cases thousands of systems. The April 2010 transition to SMPTE qualifications for equipment signifies the potential for many (perhaps unspeakable) things that exhibitors need to be on top of.]

Read the original article at: Setting The Record Straight On ShowEast Setting The Record Straight On ShowEast

Celluloid Junkie » Posted by J. Sperling Reich | November 6, 2009 5:23 pm

That’s why the number of trade show booths at this year’s ShowEast declined from around 205 to 190. “Most of the companies that were there in the past were there, they’re just downsizing,” Sunshine pointed out. “Guys who took four booths were taking two, …

What remained unchanged at this year’s ShowEast (the 25th year the event has been held) was the quality of the program itself. …

ShowEast has become known for giving exhibitors their first peak at some of the award season’s most likely Oscar contenders and this year proved no different. Lionsgate presented “Precious”, Warner Bros. brought…

There was some murmuring throughout the week about Disney not showing up with a film, as they did last year with “Bolt”. Specifically, ShowEasters were hoping to see “The Princess and the Frog”. While Disney originally made plans to bring a film to the show, …

Though there may be some who question the future of ShowEast, rest assured it will be back next year. Organizers attempted to move …

The rumors that Nielsen’s contract for ShowEast expires after 2010 are false says Sunshine, mainly because … We wish them a lot of luck with their show in 2011, but the other shows that we run, Cinema Expo International, CineAsia and ShowEast will continue as usual.”

In that case, I’ll see you all in Orlando next October.

EU Commission [Including EDCF Response] Wants To Hear from You re: DCinema

European Cinema in the Digital Era Questionaire, EDCF response attached:

The US currently has the lead in digital cinema. A digital master is already available for 90% of all US new films whereas in France (the EU’s biggest film producer) less than half of new films are available on digital. In addition, the US developed the VPF (Virtual Print Fee) model where third parties collect part of the money saved by film distributors which can then be used to finance digital equipment. In Europe, only 2428 screens have been converted so far for digital projection. Worldwide, some 12.000 screens have been digitally equipped on a total of around 110.000 worldwide. By 2012, it is estimated that nearly 20% of cinemas worldwide will be converted.

Recently, the European Commission issued the document European Commission seeks views on the opportunities and challenges for digital cinema. The paragraph above comes from the text immediately following the invitation for “EU film exhibitors, distributors, national film agencies, and public and private film organisations to share their views.”

One reads a document like this, giving it an extra dose of substance due to the gravitas of the agency. Yet it proofs the rule which asserts that everything one reads, if not written by an expert in the field, and/or not given enough space for nuance, is subject to being very wrong while appearing very right…which is OK, as long as one knows that one has then entered into the propaganda world that some special interest has thrown into the author’s universe.

The US currently has the lead in digital cinema – as a statement is somewhat correct, as long as one qualifies the word ‘lead’ as a dubious honor (as will be shown below.) By quantity and percentage there are perhaps more digital screens  and more digital movies on US soil. The projector though is doubtlessly designed and manufactured in Canada/Japan (Christie) or Japan (Sony or NEC) or Belgium (Barco), since those are the only projectors compliant with the security-centric specifications of the major studios. The servers as well are probably not entirely of US origin; Doremi, with the largest installed base, is as much a French company as a California company. Except for Dolby, which also has a large presence in England, most successful server manufacturers are from outside the US.

The VPF model may have developed in the US, but the first implementation (though not immediately successful) was attempted in Ireland. And frankly, the VPF agreements are a large band-aid on an even larger problem. The companies who have used them thus far are shells of their former selves, with much more debt and diluted stock than dreams of excitement for being in the ‘lead’.

And finally, to the 3rd sentence of the Commission’s paragraph, that 2428 screens have been converted is not a bad thing. The dirty little secret in the mix of the systems that are in the field is that none of them (with the likely exception of the Sony unit which has only been shipping relatively recently) will meet the standards that all equipment must meet after (somewhat nebulas) 2010 deadline. The deadline is a contractual obligation to run to the next level of security mandated by the ISO Standards (as described by the SMPTE standards and as initially described in the previously mentioned studio mandate, the DCI Specifications.) In practical terms, the Texas Instruments engine which powers almost all of the projectors in the field must be upgraded to a Series 2 level. It is unlikely that any Series 1 equipment will be able to be upgraded to those standards. It is not only a security issue as the Series 2 engines allow for other features that the modern facility needs, allowing a better level of subtitles, as well as open and closed captioning for the hearing and visually impaired.

And that is merely the quickly scribbled notes from one paragraph. Nothing earth shattering really. Nothing to say that the early adopters were wrong. Some of them can point to valid statistics that showed that digital screenings out-pulled film-based movies by 5:1. The current flurry of 3D movies were also only shown on digital equipment.

But it would be an easy premise to support that it would have been wrong for every facility to have converted by now, even if it were financially or technically possible. Certainly the science experiments that began appearing in the field in 2002 had all the excitement of a program that would lead one to believe that one was falling behind if they weren’t digital. But since the digital equipment is 2.5-3 times as expensive as the equipment it replaces, that is not necessarily the case. And given that few can point to a computer that works reliably 100% of the time for 100 stressful hours a day, and which is also 5 years old…well, there is a lot to be said for waiting.

So, following the grand question that insiders have asked for every year since George Lucas’ May 2002 digital Star Wars II release, “Is this the year?” and, “How do we get there?”

Respond to the EU Commission’s interest at the link: European Commission seeks views on the opportunities and challenges for digital cinema

Fun With Numbers – Mojo

STAR WARS BOX OFFICE
Note: Click chart to toggle for inflation adjusted figures.

Obviously, a couple billion bucks and 4 billion bucks is a little bit different.

That series has 4 or the top 20 positions in the Adjusted Gross, then you have to go to number 84 to get all 6 in. I choose the Tickets Sold chart. You might like the Inflation Adjusted Dollars version. Apologies to the Box Office Mojo site if I took too much to make a point.

Rank Title (click to view) Studio Est. Tickets Unadjusted Gross Year^
1 Gone with the Wind MGM 202,044,600 $198,676,459 1939^
2 Star Wars Fox 178,119,600 $460,998,007 1977^
3 The Sound of Music Fox 142,415,400 $158,671,368 1965
4 E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial Uni. 141,854,300 $435,110,554 1982^
5 The Ten Commandments Par. 131,000,000 $65,500,000 1956
6 Titanic Par. 128,345,900 $600,788,188 1997
7 Jaws Uni. 128,078,800 $260,000,000 1975
8 Doctor Zhivago MGM 124,135,500 $111,721,910 1965
9 The Exorcist WB 110,568,700 $232,671,011 1973^
10 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Dis. 109,000,000 $184,925,486 1937^
11 101 Dalmatians Dis. 99,917,300 $144,880,014 1961^
12 The Empire Strikes Back Fox 98,180,600 $290,475,067 1980^
13 Ben-Hur MGM 98,000,000 $74,000,000 1959
14 Return of the Jedi Fox 94,059,400 $309,306,177 1983^
15 The Sting Uni. 89,142,900 $156,000,000 1973
16 Raiders of the Lost Ark Par. 88,141,900 $242,374,454 1981^
17 Jurassic Park Uni. 86,205,800 $357,067,947 1993
18 The Graduate AVCO 85,571,400 $104,901,839 1967^
19 Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace Fox 84,825,800 $431,088,301 1999
20 Fantasia Dis. 83,043,500 $76,408,097 1941^
21 The Godfather Par. 78,922,600 $134,966,411 1972^
22 Forrest Gump Par. 78,545,600 $329,694,499 1994
23 Mary Poppins Dis. 78,181,800 $102,272,727 1964^
24 The Lion King BV 77,231,800 $328,541,776 1994^
25 Grease Par. 76,921,800 $188,389,888 1978^
26 Thunderball UA 74,800,000 $63,595,658 1965
27 The Dark Knight WB 74,282,100 $533,345,358 2008
28 The Jungle Book Dis. 73,679,900 $141,843,612 1967^
29 Sleeping Beauty Dis. 72,676,100 $51,600,000 1959^
30 Shrek 2 DW 71,050,900 $441,226,247 2004
31 Ghostbusters Col. 70,730,600 $238,632,124 1984^
32 Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid Fox 70,557,900 $102,308,889 1969
33 Love Story Par. 69,998,100 $106,397,186 1970
34 Spider-Man Sony 69,484,700 $403,706,375 2002
35 Independence Day Fox 69,268,900 $306,169,268 1996
36 Home Alone Fox 67,734,200 $285,761,243 1990
37 Pinocchio Dis. 67,403,300 $84,254,167 1940^
38 Cleopatra (1963) Fox 67,183,500 $57,777,778 1963
39 Beverly Hills Cop Par. 67,150,000 $234,760,478 1984
40 Goldfinger UA 66,300,000 $51,081,062 1964
41 Airport Uni. 66,111,300 $100,489,151 1970
42 American Graffiti Uni. 65,714,300 $115,000,000 1973
43 The Robe Fox 65,454,500 $36,000,000 1953
44 Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest BV 64,628,400 $423,315,812 2006
45 Around the World in 80 Days UA 64,615,400 $42,000,000 1956
46 Bambi RKO 63,712,400 $102,247,150 1942^
47 Blazing Saddles WB 63,227,500 $119,500,000 1974
48 Batman WB 62,954,600 $251,188,924 1989
49 The Bells of St. Mary’s RKO 62,745,100 $21,333,333 1945
50 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King NL 61,538,100 $377,027,325 2003
51 The Towering Inferno Fox 61,375,700 $116,000,000 1974
52 Spider-Man 2 Sony 60,158,700 $373,585,825 2004
53 My Fair Lady WB 60,000,000 $72,000,000 1964
54 The Greatest Show on Earth Par. 60,000,000 $36,000,000 1952
55 National Lampoon’s Animal House Uni. 59,890,300 $141,600,000 1978^
56 The Passion of the Christ NM 59,704,800 $370,782,930 2004^
57 Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith Fox 59,324,600 $380,270,577 2005
58 Back to the Future Uni. 59,050,700 $210,609,762 1985
59 The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers NL 57,630,400 $341,786,758 2002^
60 The Sixth Sense BV 57,579,100 $293,506,292 1999
61 Superman WB 57,358,100 $134,218,018 1978
62 Tootsie Col. 56,903,900 $177,200,000 1982
63 Smokey and the Bandit Uni. 56,832,900 $126,737,428 1977
64 Finding Nemo BV 56,337,500 $339,714,978 2003
65 Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen P/DW 55,983,900 $401,964,397 2009
66 West Side Story MGM 55,970,300 $43,656,822 1961
67 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone WB 55,913,000 $317,575,550 2001
68 Lady and the Tramp Dis. 55,734,900 $93,602,326 1955^
69 Close Encounters of the Third Kind Col. 55,575,500 $132,088,635 1977^
70 Lawrence of Arabia Col. 55,383,600 $44,824,144 1962^
71 The Rocky Horror Picture Show Fox 55,069,400 $112,892,319 1975
72 Rocky UA 55,040,000 $117,235,147 1976
73 The Best Years of Our Lives RKO 55,000,000 $23,650,000 1946
74 The Poseidon Adventure Fox 54,902,000 $84,563,118 1972
75 The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring NL 54,703,900 $314,776,170 2001^
76 Twister WB 54,688,100 $241,721,524 1996
77 Men in Black Sony 54,616,700 $250,690,539 1997
78 The Bridge on the River Kwai Col. 54,400,000 $27,200,000 1957
79 It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World MGM 53,875,400 $46,332,858 1963
80 Swiss Family Robinson Dis. 53,808,000 $40,356,000 1960
81 One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest UA 53,685,400 $108,981,275 1975
82 M.A.S.H. Fox 53,684,200 $81,600,000 1970
83 Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom Par. 53,532,800 $179,870,271 1984
84 Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones Fox 53,468,500 $310,676,740 2002^
85 Mrs. Doubtfire Fox 52,684,400 $219,195,243 1993
86 Aladdin BV 52,442,300 $217,350,219 1992

 

Birth of a Myth: the restoration of HONDO – by Bob Furmanek and Jack Theakston

The following article will present these facts documented with interactive sources.


The entire article is reprinted with permission from:

Birth of a Myth: the restoration of HONDO – 3DFPF – 3-D Film Preservation Fund a tax exempt 501(c)3 non profit corporatione following article is an interactive article.  Sources are not cited with footnotes, but presented as hyperlinks. Each source will open as a JPG image when clicked on.  Exact date and periodical is listed in the title of the image (eg. MOTIONPICTUREEXHIBITOR_071454.jpg is from The Motion Picture Exhibitor, July 14, 1954).


Production Background

Searching for an alternative to draw audiences away from television in the early 1950s, studios and exhibitors alike put their efforts into realism and new cinematic techniques. In November of 1952, stereoscopic movies made a big splash at the box office. Arch Oboler’s African adventure BWANA DEVIL, despite being considered a mediocre film, opened to great acclaim and capacity crowds. The public’s interest was not with the content of the film, but what was going on in the theater: lions were leaping into the audience, and there was an added dimension to the screen– depth. Despite decades of experiments, short subjects and failed attempts at 3-D, BWANA DEVIL had finally brought to the public an economic system of depth-realism. Oboler’s production gained its notoriety from its use of the Natural Vision three-dimensional camera.   Natural Vision operated with two cameras, focused at angles and distances approximating two human eyes, and photographed the subject with two separate 35mm negatives. In projection, Polaroid filters were placed in front of two projectors running in precise synchronization and the left/right 35mm prints were projected onto a silver screen. Audience members wearing the special Polaroid glasses would then maintain an illusion of stereoscopic imagery in their sight.

Word spread around town instantly of Oboler’s financial success, and all of the major studios quickly went into production with their own 3-D films, either using the Natural Vision camera rig or devising their own.  The most successful of these films was Warner’s HOUSE OF WAX (April 1953), starring Vincent Price and also released in the WarnerPhonic stereophonic sound system.  Jack Warner, so impressed by the financial success of the film, announced a rigorous schedule of 22 films in 3-D, representing half of the studios upcoming shooting schedule.

The All Media Camera RigOn May 19, Jack Warner announced the new All-Media Camera, a camera designed to shoot in any format– black and white or color, 3-D and/or widescreen, or flat. The rig was designed and built by the studios camera department, and would be utilized for the first time on HONDO. Cinematographers Robert Burks and Archie Stout would be shooting on location, in 3-D and widescreen. Films shot with the All-Media rig were composed for the aspect ratio of 1.75:1 or 1.85:1.

Principal photography began in Camargo, Mexico on June 11. The picturesque landscape would provide the perfect visual setting, but the director and cinematographers had trouble adjusting to the new camera. On June 18, Jack Warner viewed three reels of dailies and was concerned about the lack of close-ups, especially in the scene where John Wayne first meets Geraldine Page. He sent a telegram to the Duke and said “Director is not moving you and Geraldine close enough to camera. Everything seems to be too far away. Must have usual over-shoulder close shots individuals and tight twos in three-dimensional pictures so we can see peoples expressions and everything else.” On June 20, John Wayne replied: “Farrow has done everything but play music to get camera in for close shots. Seems our lenses are matted for 1.75 or 1.8 screen, plus fact that cameraman is over cautious for fear front office will scream eyestrain. Will show cameraman your wire. Think it will do the trick. He is really working hard but has limited us in making shots because of his fear and reluctance to do a shot that might throw background lines too wide an angle.”

Jack Warner’s advice was taken, and Robert Burks starting moving the camera in tighter for close shots. However, over the next several weeks, the elements proved to be a major problem. The intense heat, dust, wind and rain caused multiple delays throughout shooting. As a result, there are several shots in HONDO that are flat, due to a malfunction with one of the cameras.

By the end of the summer of 1953, interest began to dwindle in 3-D, resulting in a quick decline of both productions and exhibitions.  Projectionists were finding it difficult to maintain synchronization between the two reels of film running during projection, a malfunction that would cause severe eye-strain and headaches for the audience. On September 16, 1953, 20th Century Fox premiered their anamorphic process CinemaScope with their production of THE ROBE. They wasted no time in advertising the new process as “the modern miracle you see without glasses.”

At the same time, several studios reversed their policy which had mandated that all 3-D movies must play their entire run of stereoscopic playdates before being available as a standard, flat film.  With the studios’ new attitude towards the exhibition format, most exhibitors opted to play the new 3-D releases flat. By November 1953, 3-D was considered poison at the box office.

But 3-D movies weren’t dead yet.  Due to newly developed technical advancements in projection techniques, the studios began a new campaign to bring back 3-D, with their ace being a new group of quality, high-budget 3-D films that would outshine the competition.  Among the Fall/Winter 1953 season’s titles were Columbia’s MISS SADIE THOMPSON with Rita Hayworth,  Paramount’s MONEY FROM HOME with Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis as well as Hal Wallis’ timely Korean War docu-drama CEASE FIRE, RKO’s scandalous production of THE FRENCH LINE with Jane Russell, MGM’s film version of the Cole Porter musical, KISS ME KATE and Warner Bros.’ highly anticipated John Wayne western HONDO.

Metro Goldwyn Mayer decided to test public opinion: they would exhibit KISS ME KATE in six theaters. Three theaters would play the film flat, and the remaining three would show it in 3-D. The public’s reaction would dictate which version would go into wide release. The 3-D showings had a substantially better response and KISS ME KATE went into wide release in either format, but with the suggestion that showmen across the country play the stereoscopic version of its film. With the exception of Radio City Music Hall, most other engagements for KATE were in 3-D.

Hondo Ad InsertIt was into this uncertain climate which HONDO first went into release. Jack Warner and his studio had been a staunch advocate of 3-D, and wasted no time in promoting their forthcoming release. The first trade ads appeared on November 7, and the film was trade-screened for the press on November 16, 1953. The reaction was sensational. Critics unanimously praised the film, and its effective use of stereoscopic cinematography. Warner Bros. was so enthusiastic about the films dimensional qualities, they made sure to emphasize that fact in their trade ads. In order to satisfy theaters not equipped for 3-D, Warner Bros. stated that HONDO would also be available in its flat version.  With the official release date set for January, the studio assigned release #312 to the 3-D version, and  #349 to the 2-D version.

In an effort to ensure the highest quality presentations, the Polaroid Corporation (who obviously had a vested interest in the continued success of 3-D movies) developed and advertised new, comfortable plastic glasses and clip-ons as well as synchronization aids which would enable operators to quickly detect and remedy any out-of-sync 3-D presentation. Offered to theaters at a nominal cost, Polaroid did all they could to insure that the 3-D movie industry would last. They even took out special ads in local newspapers assuring the public that the 3-D to be seen in HONDO was better than anything they had seen before.

HONDO had its world premiere on November 24, 1953.  John Wayne and Ward Bond flew to Texas for the premiere in Houston, and then went to a second premiere on November 25 in El Paso. Warner Bros. announced a special group of pre-release playdates commencing on Thanksgiving Day, November 26, 1953, in thirty-five major cities, including Detroit, Atlanta, Boston, and Washington.  Any fear that 3-D would hurt the films box office potential was quickly diminished as HONDO did terrific business wherever it played, and was held-over for a second (and even for a third or fourth week) in most engagements. Jack Warner even placed an ad in both the Hollywood Reporter and Daily Variety boasting to his peers (and critics) about HONDO’s phenomenal success.

The studios publicity department went to work and sent View-Master preview reels to camera shops and movie theaters across the country.  The View-Master reel depicted seven scenes from the film, each in full color and stereoscopic 3-D.  National Screen service provided the cabinets in which the reel could be viewed, complete with a silk-screened, die-cut card on top of the cabinet. As part of their rigorous ad campaign, Warners arranged for a television contest to be broadcast on the CBS program, “The Big Payoff.”

Despite a city-wide newspaper strike wherein there was no advertising available, HONDO still managed to perform an amazing $55,000 during its first week engagement at the 3,664-seat Paramount Theater in New York. The film was held over for three weeks during this play date, and at the Paramount alone grossed $128,000 in ticket sales.  A smash hit on his hands, Jack Warner was quick to re-state his faith in the future of 3-D movies.

Hondo AdHONDO continued to pick up box office steam throughout December, where it opened in such major cities as St. Louis, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, Portland and Minneapolis.  In January, 1954, it opened in additional cities, including San Francisco, Chicago, Oakland, Denver, Seattle and Toronto.

3-D bookings maintained their popularity into February.  In New York alone, it opened on February 3, 1954 at 31 theaters in Manhattan, the Bronx and Westchester.  One week later, ten additional RKO-circuit houses in Brooklyn and Queens added stereoscopic showings.  This pattern of second-run and small-town dimensional bookings was typical of the widespread interest and success of HONDO.  Even many drive-ins, which because of technical reasons were not usually 3-D friendly, played the stereoscopic version of the film.

Despite Warner’s announcement that any exhibitor had the option to play the film flat, it is interesting to note that until February 1954, all known bookings of HONDO were stereoscopic in every engagement.  In fact, finding any flat bookings during this period proved difficult. One flat playdate was found at the sub-run booking of the 800-seat Belmont Theatre in Long Beach, CA, but only after having played two-weeks starting Christmas Day at the 1,800-seat State Theatre and the 1,200-seat Towne Theatre, both in 3-D.

March and April of 1954 found HONDO finally beginning to open at some small theaters and drive-ins which did not have the necessary equipment for stereoscopic exhibition, long after the 3-D version had played out its first-run engagements in that particular area.  Even so, bookings in 3-D could still be found in such towns as Charleston, West Virginia and Winnipeg, Manitoba.

HONDO’s 3-D success was not limited to the U.S.  On February 27, 1954, it opened to capacity crowds at London’s 1,734-seat Warner Theater, where it would play for five weeks and bring in over $40,000.  Nearly three months later, HONDO was still playing in 3-D in theaters throughout South London.

With an average price of 49-cents a ticket in 1954, HONDO finished up the year with an impressive domestic gross of $4,100,000, a very large percentage of those being stereoscopic playdates.  In 1954, HONDO was the 16th highest grossing film of the year, and the 106th top grossing film of all time. After Warner’s HOUSE OF WAX, which grossed an astonishing $6,500,000, it was the second highest grossing 3-D film of the 1950’s.

Restoration and Myth

In 1988, the late Michael Wayne, eldest son of John Wayne and head of Batjac Productions, took the film to Daniel Symmes. Both 3-D expert and historian, Mr. Symmes utilized the original left/right negatives to create a new 3-D version of HONDO for television (details about the history of the Wayne/Symmes restorations may be found in this informative article by Mr. Symmes himself). For technical reasons, instead of being presented in the polarized format, HONDO was converted to an anaglyph– the “red and blue” 3-D which many remembered from 3-D comic books in the 1950’s.

To promote the television premiere, Michael Wayne was interviewed in a June, 1991 Associated Press article. “When we started filming ‘Hondo’, 3-D was the rage. However, it takes a year to complete a film, and by that time, interest in 3-D had died down. So the film was only shown in 3-D in two theaters in the country for about a week. Fortunately, the film caught on without the 3-D and paid its negative cost in about eight weeks.” With all due respect to Mr. Wayne, he overlooked the fact that HONDO played across the country in 3-D. To be fair, he was 16 years old when it was released, and probably paid very little attention to the distribution pattern for his father’s new film.

The June, 1991 broadcast did substantially well in ratings, and collected a good amount of money for charity through the sale of glasses. But a video restoration was not enough for the determined Mr. Wayne; he wanted to insure that his father’s film-making legacy would survive for future generations. Commencing in April of 1994, Wayne and Symmes began an exhaustive on-film restoration of HONDO in hopes that someday it would be re-issued into theaters. The extensive restoration took several months and pooled various film materials and sources to create new 35mm preservation elements. The restored dual-strip 35mm 3-D print was excellent, and a great accomplishment by the team that had worked so hard to preserve the film. Unfortunately, the print was put into a storage vault and was never shown again.

When Michael Wayne passed away in 2003, his widow, Gretchen Wayne took over as head of Batjac Productions. In 2007, she announced that HONDO would be restored in a new digital 3-D version by Post Logic Studios, a company whose only previous experience in 3-D was the Robert Rodriguez film SPY KIDS 3-D. Unfortunately, between Mrs. Wayne and Post Logic Studios, more incorrect information was circulated about the film.

Noted magazines, papers and journals across the country continued to reprint the mistakes. In Variety, on May 9th, 2007, David S. Cohen’s article on Mrs. Wayne’s reissue screening at the Cannes film festival was riddled with errors. “Few people alive have seen it as it was meant to be seen,” wrote Cohen, who also added, “’Hondo’ in 3-D screened at only a few theaters and has almost never been seen in 3-D since.” In the same article, Gretchen Wayne is quoted: “I never really got it, it never really affected me that much…she says of the original 3-D, with its red-green anaglyph glasses.” Mr. Cohen not only made the same mistakes as Michael Wayne, he added his own. The only time HONDO was ever shown with anaglyphic (red and cyan, not red and green) glasses was the television broadcast of 1991.

Further confusion erupted in an article posted on digitalcontentproducer.com on May 15 by a Mr. “kraz.”  “Post Logic received the original right eye and left eye film negative, which was shot in stereoscopic anaglyph for 3D viewing,” the article erroneously said.  “Since the film was shot as an anaglyph, the left and right eye plates had to be as stable as possible, with little or no shifting between them,” one technician was quoted as saying. Aside from the fact that it is next to impossible to “shoot” an anaglyph in-camera, Post-Logic forgot all about the experts at Polaroid who had worked so hard fifty-four years earlier to insure that each theater presented HONDO in the absolute finest Polaroid projection.

Unfortunately, much of this 3-D history is forgotten today. Major industry papers such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times frequently reprint the now-commonplace myth that 3-D films from the ’50s were seen with “red and green” glasses. The fact is that all 50 feature films from the “Golden Age” of 3-D (including “House of Wax”, “Creature From the Black Lagoon”, “Kiss Me Kate”, “It Came From Outer Space” and even “Robot Monster”) were shown with two projectors in Polaroid projection; none were shown in the anaglyphic format during their original release.

An article in 3-D Review Online Magazine on June 7 confused the facts even more. “In fact, this will be the first time ever that Hondo will be screened in 3-D in Europe” the report said, completely overlooking the successful London playdates. “Hondo was initially released in 3-D and played for a week in select major cities. However, Warner Bros. pulled the 3-D prints and general release prints were made in regular flat aspect ratio. Theater owners also found the projection process cumbersome, and the extra expense did not add appreciably to the box-office gross, so they preferred to show regular film prints.”

Further misinformation was printed that substantiated this quote in Michael Goldman’s article in Millimeter Magazine. “It was one of very few stereoscopic 3D screenings of Hondo that the world had ever seen because Jack Warner, then president of Warner Bros. Studios, had become convinced that the 3D craze was over by the time the movie was ready to be released. Warner decided it was too expensive to release the movie wide in the stereoscopic format. Hondo was exhibited as a traditional 2D film that year, built out of the original left-eye negative, and in the decades since, it has been seen in various home-video and broadcast versions as a standard 2D movie.”  The same article repeated the misinformation about anaglyph glasses.

In conclusion, Mrs. Wayne was quoted as saying, “They were doing 3D [in the 1950s] to get people back into theaters, today, we have digital cinema, and about 700 or 800 theaters in the U.S. that can now show this movie in the format they wanted it shown in. And look what Jim Cameron and others are doing ­ that’s all coming forward as a response to home entertainment systems. That’s why I think a Hondo tour would be a huge hit. Everyone knows John Wayne, but very few people have ever seen him in the 3D format.”

We respectfully disagree. As our research has proven, John Wayne was seen in magnificent Polaroid 3-D by several million people, to say the least.

3D Preservation Logo Special thanks to Dan Symmes, Jeff Joseph, Leith Adams (Warner Bros. Archive), Sandra J. Lee and Ned Comstock (USC Cinematic Arts Library, USC Warner Bros. Archives), Newspaperarchive.com, Greg Kintz and the New York Public Library. This article and its contents © Copyright 2007, The 3-D Film Preservation Fund/Bob Furmanek/Jack Theakston

TOP 3-D MYTHS – 3D Preservation Fund

Read the entire 10 points – Top 3-D Myths – 3DFPF – 3-D Film Preservation Fund a tax exempt 501(c)3 non profit corporation

3D films of the 1950’s were viewed through red and green glasses
Not true. Except for a few short films presented in anaglyph form in the early months of 1953 (not widely seen), all of the features, shorts, and cartoons exhibited in commercial theaters from 1952 through 1955 were projected using polarized light. The glasses had colorless lenses exactly like today’s …

Does a 3-D film have to be shot twice in order to yield a 2-D version?
No. Contrary to the memories of some cast members of 2-D films, a 3-D film only need be shot with a 3-D camera to yield a 2-D print later. Simply put, …

The confusion may lie in the fact that a handful of early CinemaScope productions were shot in both the anamorphic CinemaScope ratio (2.55-1) and the standard

3D glasses cause eyestrain/headaches

Not true. 3D glasses are passive, in that they do not DO anything except filter light, much as …
…for several reasons:

  1. Improper camera 3D technique – This is especially critical in 3D films since the image is …
  2. Improper projection technique – Keeping the projectors in correct synchronization and phase is critical; unfortunately, these standards were f…
    …was a big problem. It STILL is.
  3. Eyes – We all see 3D differently. It is highly subjective. Roughly 10% of us cannot see 3D well, or at all, …
    …though this is fairly inconsequential compared to the other major issues.

The 3-D glasses were always made out of cardboard
Not true. This was true only initially in 1953. Once it was clear that there was a market for 3-D, the studios addressed the complaints about the problems with the cardboard frames by introducing plastic frames and even clips-ons for people who regularly wore glasses. And they were available for purchase in those times. …

3D Movies were “cheesy” exploitation films with lower string talent
Not true. Here’s a partial list of some big stars that appeared in front of the 3-D camera: John Wayne, Rita Hayworth, Kathryn Grayson, Howard Keel, Bob Fosse, Robert Mitchum, Linda Darnell, Jack Palance, Edward G. Robinson, Dean Martin, Jerry Lewis, Jane …

Great directors and cinematographers worked on these films, including …

3D Movies of the 1950’s were loaded with gimmicks to show off the process

Too many bad 3D movies killed off 3D in 1950s

3D Movies of the 1950’s were not in widescreen

3D films today are of higher technical quality than those of the 1950’s

KISS ME KATE and HONDO were shown mostly flat in their original engagements

DIAL M FOR MURDER was never shown in 3D in its original release

INVADERS FROM MARS and THEM were shot in 3D

Again, read the entire, interesting, unexpergated, article: Top 3-D Myths – 3DFPF – 3-D Film Preservation Fund a tax exempt 501(c)3 non profit corporation

Cinedigm, Sageview, 75 million, 8%, 35% potential interest

At the time of Sageview’s Guitar Center purchases, they made thestatement: Sageview aims to differentiate itself from other investmentfirms, promising neither to be a passive investor like a mutual fundnor an “activist” investor that puts pressure on management of publiccompanies. Messrs. Gilhuly and Stuart seek to take stakes valued atabout $100m in strong companies with stock-market values from $500m to$5bn and hold those stakes for several years.

In further news, another investment specialist, Adam M Mizel, previously on the board, will be joining the working staff of Cinedigm as the unexcitingly titled CFO and the excitingly titledChief Strategy Officer. According to the reporting services, Adam owns 2 million plus shares of Cinedigm stock, though somehow indirectly. (March 19, 2009 Statement of (indirect) Ownership)

There are some who say that business people shouldn’t be involved in running government and finance people shouldn’t run companies – that the philosophies are diametrically opposed – today’s business people are first tasked at looking out for the shareholders bottom line while governments are tasked with looking after the bottom line and Commons of ‘We the People’. Similarly, they say that finance people should focus on meeting the conservative needs of getting funding to the operational units in an efficient manner, while Strategic management should be focused upon turning dreams into fruition, damn the torpedoes.

Cinedigm though, has done all the logical things, but been trapped by the politics of competing studio and exhibitor needs and wants, which in turn has made all their strategy turn into a mere survival game. These latest moves, plus moves earlier this year that pushed off more immediate dept repayments by refinancing their GE dept again, give them a bit of a cleaner field to operate, hoping that the industry will pick up enough to tilt the momentum (defined as size of installed base times products they can sell to the installed base at a better return than movies, allowing the VPF returns to pay off debt.) Perhaps it is appropriate to have a finance person involved in strategy when the strategy has changed from Create to Survive…which is really the theme for the entire industry.

This author will be writing for more concise information to the contact on the bottom of the press releases (1),and (2) Mr. Adam Mizel. Hopefully some more data will also come during webcast’d conference call. Expect edits… Info below:

CONFERENCE CALL NOTIFICATION

Cinedigm will host a conference call to discuss its financial results at9:00 a.m. Eastern on Wednesday, August 12, 2009. The conference can beaccessed by dialing 719.325.4851 at least five minutes before the start ofthe call. No passcode is required. The conference call will also bewebcast simultaneously and will be accessible via the web on Cinedigm’s Website, www.cinedigmcorp.com. A replay of the call will be available after1:30 p.m. Eastern at 719.457.0820 or 888.203.1112, passcode 8479698. Thereplay will be accessible through Wednesday, August 19th.

Mobile 3-D, Part II: Music to One’s Eyes? – mobilizedtv

This is part 2 of a two-part series by Mark Schubin, a multiple Emmy Award-winning SMPTE Fellow who has worked professionally in TV since 1967. You can find it unexerpted at: [Mobile 3-D, Part II: Music to One’s Eyes?]

Read Part 1 here.

The Society of Motion-Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) devoted an entire webcast of its Professional Development Academy (PDA) in June of 2009 to the subject, “Producing Stereoscopic Content: What Makes Great 3-D Great and What Can Go Wrong.” How, for example, can distant scenes be made to look like they’re in 3-D (long distances dilute the effect) without …

As the existence of the SMPTE PDA webcast shows, effort is being devoted to production issues. And, as the appearance of a glasses-free 3-D mobile-phone display at the exhibit of Korea’s Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) at …

The third category, however, is psychophysical issues–how viewers respond psychologically to the physical stimuli of 3-D imagery. …

The infinity-interpupillary problem is different. When looking at something infinitely distant, eyes point straight ahead, creating parallel views separated…

In 3-D, “infinity” can actually be pretty close. When looking at something at a distance of 120 feet, our eyes each “toe-in” from looking straight …

That’s not too much of an issue for 3-D in a movie theater. The left- and right-eye images of a distant object can be placed 2.5 inches apart. Unfortunately, if that’s done for a 30-foot-wide screen, …

On a 15-foot screen, everything would appear to be too close. On a home TV, the same object would seem really too close. That’s why 3-D TV might not be able to “repurpose” 3-D movies directly…

Perhaps that’s one reason why 3-D TV has yet to take off. The first 3-D TV broadcast was in 1928, and by 1953 Business Week ran the headline …

No one would argue that music adds to the reality of dramatic or comedic programming. We don’t go through life with a band of personal musicians providing a background to our emotional states….

What changed his mind was Bernard Hermann’s music score. It converted what might have been a mere TV episode into a movie classic, …

Could 3-D be similar to movie music? The stereoscopic scene shown on the mobile phone at the ETRI exhibit at NAB 2009 …

Tags: , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 25th, 2009 at 9:00AM and is filed under Guest Column, Home Feature.

See Part One: Muscles Matter