Category Archives: FAQs

Eventually, there will be FAQs, but until then, please enjoy this selection of Glossaries.

Exhibition Glossaries

Warner Bros. Digital Cinema Glossary – (PDF)

Rex Beckett's dicineco DCinema Glossary (Online)

Council of Europe's Glossary Digitisation (DOC)

XDC's DC Glossary (PDF)

Michael Karagosian's MKPE Digital Cinema Technology FAQ

Michael Karagosian's MKPE Digital Cinema Business FAQs

Dolby's Digital Cinema Glossary (pdf)

Dolby's Digital Cinema Glossary – (Online)

Europa Distribution DC Glossary (PDF)

DCI DCinema Specs 1.1 Glossary (PDF)


Post Production/Mastering Glossaries

EDCF's Mastering Guide Glossary – (PDF)

Phil Green' s Digital Intermediate Guide (Online)

Surreal Road's Digital Intermediate Primer (Online)

Surreal Road's Digital Intermediate FAQ (Online)

Surreal Road's Digital Intermediate Glossary (Online)

Digital Rebellions' Post Production Glossary (Online)

 

3D Glossary

ev3's 3D Glossary


Production Glossaries

Moving Picture Companies Jargon Explained (Online)

Octamas Film Production DC Glossary (Online)

Pocket Lint's Glossary of 3D Terms (Online)

Kodak's Glossary of Film – (Online)

Kodak's Cinema and Television Glossary (Online)

Sony's ABCs of Digital Cinema (PDF)

 

Associated Glossaries

Christie's Technology Explained (OnLine)

Sony's Audio Glossary (PDF)

 

CineCert Gets DCI Cert Nod

– DCI announced today that there will be 3 places to send your gear to: CineCert (contact John Hurst), DMC/Keio University in Tokyo, Japan (contact Naoshisa Ohta) and Media Innovation Center of Venice, Italy (contact Angelo D ‘Alessio). The press release is here.]
John made the point,

It should be clear that we will issue a ‘report of compliance’. This is not ‘certification’, which is a charged word, with specific meaning.
In addition, we understand that there will be other announcements about contracts with other labs from DCI in the near future.

Why is this important? There are a few reasons.

Primarily, clients who are involved with VPF agreements obligate themselves to use DCI Compliant equipment. If they don’t, then they can get cut off. This has happened before when early-adopting customers of Avica or XDC could not get movies because their servers couldn’t play JPEG 2000…only MPEG-2.

And consider the poor manufacturer who has to promise that their equipment is DCI Compliant. If they are a public company, they are wary of making such statements since Sarbanes-Oxley regulations prohibit them from taking profit on items that have unknown liabilities. Not having anyone to test for certification puts them in a difficult ‘unknown liabilities’ situation.

And, finally, for the industry itself. In olden times, one recieved a film and one did the best possible with it. The Laws of Physics decreed that the film would degrade, but there was little that the cinema could do to keep the quality up.

Digital can change that. Light, Color, White Point…all those fun SMPTE Standards can be checked for and maintained. (Link to a list in pdf of all completed SMPTE DCinema Documents.) Equipment known to be compliant is the first step to a better picture (and sound~!) for us all, and a level playing field for all cinemas.

Part Two; the implemation of a set of standard quality control procedures built into the cinema’s processes. You can read about that at our sister company’s site: DCinemaCompliance

Senate Legislation Would Federalize Cybersecurity

[Editor] Not discounting privacy and other issues, let’s remember that all DCinema systems are private networks, by any definition…and most are or will be connected to the internet via satellite or optical fibre, or the private phone line modem.

Second, if anyone is following the conversations about the hopes of DCinema and ADA compliance for HI and VI captioning and who might wonder if the government will get involved…perhaps this article will seem interesting…and again, notwithstanding the merits of the idea that there should be standards and they should be monitored. 

Returning to the article…

Currently, government responsibility for cybersecurity is split: The Pentagon and the National Security Agency safeguard military networks, while the Department of Homeland Security provides assistance to private networks. Previous cybersecurity initiatives have largely concentrated on reducing the vulnerability of government and military computers to hackers.

A 60-day federal review of the nation’s defenses against computer-based attacks is underway, and the administration has signaled its intention to incorporate private industry into those defenses in an unprecedented way.

Read the entire article at: <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/31/AR2009033103684.html>

“People say this is a military or intelligence concern, but it’s a lot more than that,” Rockefeller, a former intelligence committee chairman, said in an interview. …

U.S. intelligence officials have warned that a sustained attack on private computer networks …

The Rockefeller-Snowe measure would create the Office of the National Cybersecurity Adviser,…

The proposal would also mandate an ongoing, quadrennial review of the nation’s cyberdefenses….

Last week, Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair told reporters that one agency should oversee …

“The taxpayers of this country have spent enormous sums developing a world-class capability…

Blair acknowledged there will be privacy concerns about centralizing cybersecurity, …